A method for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams
Chen Huan1, Ling Xiao-Hui2, Chen Zhi-Hong1, Li Qian-Guang1, Lv Hao1, Yu Hua-Qing1, Yi Xu-Nong1, †,
College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, China
Department of Physics and Electronic Information Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: xnyi@szu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11547017), the Hubei Engineering University Research Foundation, China (Grant No. z2014001), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2014CFB578).

Abstract
Abstract

We propose a method for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams. A step phase introduced by a spatial light modulator (SLM) first makes the incident laser beam have a nodal cycle. This phase is dynamic in nature because it depends on the optical length. Then a Pancharatnam–Berry phase (PBP) optical element is used to manipulate the local polarization of the optical field by modulating the geometric phase. The experimental results show that this scheme can effectively create double-ring-shaped vector beams. It provides much greater flexibility to manipulate the phase and polarization by simultaneously modulating the dynamic and the geometric phases.

1. Introduction

Spatially inhomogeneous polarization states (radial and azimuthal polarizations are the typical examples), also termed as vector beams, have attracted more and more attention in recent years. In contrast to spatially homogeneous polarizations, such as linear, elliptical, and circular polarizations, vector beams have some unique optical properties. Recently, many types of vector beams have been reported, such as cylindrical vector beam,[1] full Poincaré beam,[2,3] hybridly polarized vector beam,[4,5] etc. The radially polarized (RP) and azimuthally polarized (AP) light beams are two special cases of the cylindrical vector beams and have been investigated by a few researchers. RP and AP beams focused by an objective lens with a high numerical aperture have been reported in the last few years.[613] The researchers found that the RP beams have a large longitudinal electric field component, while the AP beams can be focused into a hollow dark spot. Lerman et al. carried out a study on hybridly polarized vector beams.[14] Beckley et al. explored the change of polarization properties during propagation.[15] Due to their interesting properties, the vector beams have many potential applications in optical communication, optical trapping, particle manipulation, laser processing, super-resolution microscopy, and optical imaging, as well as in optical data storage.[1] Various methods are proposed to generate vector beams. The schemes can be divided into active and passive ones. The active methods force the lasers to oscillate in vector modes with technically designed optical resonators.[16] The passive schemes use either the wavefront reconstruction based on specially designed elements[1722] or interferometric schemes.[2325]

More recently, some researchers paid attention to the so-called double-ring-shaped vector beam. Kozawa and Zhang et al. theoretically demonstrated that a tightly focused double-ring-shaped RP beam can produce an optical cage in the focal region. It can be used to trap particles with refractive indices smaller than that of the ambient.[26,27] The focusing properties of the double-ring-shaped AP light beam were studied by some researchers.[28,29] It was shown that a subwavelength focal hole and a long depth of focus are acquired near the focus. Due to the potential application in optical trapping and particle manipulation, to efficiently generate double-ring-shaped vector beams is a significative work. Specially designed optical resonators and interferometric schemes are commonly used for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams.[30,31] However, the method with specially designed optical resonators lacks flexibility and the interferometric schemes are not stable enough. In this work, we propose a simple and stable setup to produce double-ring-shaped vector beams by modulating the dynamic phase and the Pancharatnam–Berry phase (PBP). The PBP is one of the two kinds of geometric phases. The other kind of geometric phase is the Rytov–Vladimirskii–Berry phase. The PBP is linked to the local polarization changes of light. The optical elements making use of the geometric PBP to produce a desired wavefront are called PBP optical elements.[3234] Different from the refractive and diffractive elements, the PBP optical elements introduce the phase by space-variant polarization instead of optical path differences. These particular devices for phase-front shaping have been applied to generate vector or vortex beams, focus, manipulate the photonic spin Hall effect,[35,36] and so on.

In this paper, we theoretically analyze the manipulation of polarization with PBP elements. On this basis, we propose an experimental setup to realize the polarization mode conversion based on PBP elements at wavelength 632.8 nm. We firstly generate a double-ring-shaped beam with a spatial light modulator by modulating the dynamic phase. Then, a PBP element is employed to manipulate the local polarization of the light field by modulating the geometric phase (PBP). The experimental results show that a linearly polarized (LP) Gauss beam can be converted into a double-ring-shaped vector beam. The local polarization direction of the double-ring-shaped vector beam is determined by the angle between the polarization direction of the incident LP light and the initial optical axis orientation of the PBP element on the x axis. Therefore, we can obtain a double-ring-shaped cylindrical vector beam by rotating the PBP element. This novel method for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams can also be extended to produce other higher-order vector beams.

2. Optical PBP element

Optical PBP elements are wavefront shaping devices that introduce the phase by changing the local polarization of light. In this work, the PBP elements are fabricated by writing nanoscale wave plates in fused silica glasses with a femtosecond laser.[37] The intense laser irradiation can decompose the uniform glass (SiO2) into porous glass (SiO2(1−x)+xO2), which results in the change of the refractive index. It means that an artificial birefringence, i.e., form birefringence, is introduced. We can obtain the birefringence by controlling the deposited energy in the silica glasses. The phase retardation can be written as

where (neno) is the induced birefringence and d is the writing depth. The effective ordinary and extraordinary refractive indices can be expressed as[38]

where f is the filling factor, and n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the nanoscale wave plates. Here, the filling factor is 0.1–0.2, the writing period is 200–250 nm, and the line width is 30–50 nm.

According to the required phase modulation, these nanoscale wave plates are specially arranged into a prescribed pattern. Due to the manipulation of polarization by these wave plates, a PBP is generated. Here, we consider each wave plate having an identical phase retardation. The orientation of the space-variant slow axis is denoted by ϕ(x,y), which is the angle between the slow axis and the fixed reference axis x. Now, let us consider a specific pattern geometry described by the following expression:

where φ = arctan(y/x), and q is a constant. Figure 1 illustrates schematically the slow axis distributions in the PBP elements with q = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5, respectively. The initial optical axis lies in the x axis.

Fig. 1. Slow axis spatial distributions of the PBP elements with (a) q = 0.5, (b) q = 1.0, and (c) q = 1.5.

The Jones matrix is a convenient tool for describing the PBP elements. The Jones matrix M can be easily derived as follows:

where R(ϕ) is a 2×2 rotation matrix, Mwp is the Jones matrix of the wave plate, and Γ is the phase retardation of the wave plate.

Let us now consider the case that an LP Gauss beam illuminates a PBP element. The Jones vector of the input field is then given by

where θ0 is the polarization angle of light, E0(r) is the radially-dependent amplitude, and w0 is the waist width. At the PBP element output plane, we obtain the following field:

where ψ = 2(ϕθ0) = 2(θ0) is an additional space-variant PBP depending on the local optical axis orientation of the PBP element.

Let us assume that the phase retardation Γ is equal to π (corresponding to a half-wave plate). According to Eq. (6), the output field should be rewritten as

where m = 2q is the polarization order number of the polarized light field. In fact, m is the number of polarization rotations per round trip. It is clear from Eq. (7) that the output wave is a cylindrical vector beam. The local polarization orientation depends on the orientation of the PBP element in the xy plane and the polarization angle of the incident light. When the polarization angle of the incident beam is fixed, the local polarization orientation of the cylindrical vector beam is only determined by the orientation of the PBP element. That is, we can obtain cylindrical vector beams with different local polarizations by rotating the PBP element.

3. Experimental setup and results

The experimental setup is demonstrated in Fig. 2(a). The above theoretical analysis shows that the PBP elements can manipulate the local polarization of light beams. To obtain a double-ring-shaped intensity distribution, we also need to modulate the input Gauss beam into the double-ring shape. For this purpose, we employ a reflective phase only spatial light modulator (SLM) (Holoeye Pluto-Vis, Germany). Each pixel of the SLM can produce an individually programmable phase shift in the interval between 0 and 2π. Here, we let the SLM provide 0 phase shift in the central circular zone and π phase shift in the surrounding zone. It means that the reflective light wave acquires a step phase from the SLM. The step phase makes the reflective wave produce a nodal cycle in the azimuthal direction where the electric field is zero. Due to the π phase difference, the polarization directions of the central electric field and the outer rings are opposite. The SLM can be replaced by a step phase plate in practical applications. It is notable that the phase modulation introduced by the SLM or step phase plate is purely dynamic in nature, because the phase is dependent on the optical length. The grey level image of the step phase loaded in the SLM is shown in Fig. 2(b). Figure 2(c) is the intensity distribution of the beam reflected by the SLM. As an example, the intensity distribution of the beam emerging from the PBP element with q = 0.5 is shown in Fig. 2(d). We can see that the intensity at the center of the beam is zero due to the existence of polarization singularity.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams, where GLP is a Glan laser polarizer, and CCD is a charge-coupled device. (b) The grey level image displayed on the SLM. (c) The intensity distribution of the laser beam reflected by the SLM. (d) The intensity distribution of the beam emerging from the PBP element with q = 0.5.

Figure 3 shows the created double-ring-shaped vector beams with polarization order m = 1. A horizontally polarized light firstly impinges on the SLM and generates a nodal cycle. A PBP element with q = 1/2 is then used to manipulate the local polarization of the double-ring beam based on the modulation of geometric phase. To analyze the polarization distribution, a polarizer (GLP2) is inserted behind the PBP element and rotated to different polarization angles. The first row in Fig. 3 is the experimental results when the PBP element is placed at 0°. We can see that the intensity pattern rotates with the polarizer in the same direction and the nodal line is perpendicular to the polarization axis of the polarizer. Therefore, we can reconstruct the local polarization structure. The vector field is plotted in the last column. It is obvious that the output beam is a radially polarized double-ring-shaped vector beam. The second row in Fig. 3 is the experimental results when the PBP element is placed at +90°. The measured intensity pattern rotates with the polarizer in the opposite direction and the nodal line is parallel to the polarization axis of the polarizer. Obviously, the output field is an azimuthally polarized double-ring-shaped vector beam.

Fig. 3. The experimentally generated double-ring-shaped vector beams with polarization order m = 1 by a PBP element with q = 1/2. The first row shows the respective intensity distributions behind a polarizer (GLP2) at different polarization angles when the PBP element is placed at 0°. The second row shows the intensity cross-sections when the PBP element rotates +90°.

Next, we respectively adopt two PBP elements with q = 1.0 and q = 1.5 in our experiments. The experimental results are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. It is easy to find that the intensity patterns in Fig. 4 have two nodal lines in the azimuthal direction and one nodal cycle in the radial direction. Therefore, the intensity spot is segmented into eight segments. It means that the PBP element with q = 1.0 can be used to generate a double-ring-shaped vector beam with polarization order m = 2. Similarly, we find that the intensity patterns in Fig. 5 have three nodal lines in the azimuthal direction and the PBP element with q = 1.5 can be used to generate a double-ring-shaped vector beam with polarization order m = 3.

Fig. 4. The experimentally generated double-ring-shaped vector beams with polarization order m = 2 by a PBP element with q = 1.0. The first row shows the respective intensity distributions behind a polarizer (GLP2) at different polarization angles when the PBP element is placed at 0°. The second row shows the intensity cross-sections when the PBP element rotates +90°.
Fig. 5. The experimentally generated double-ring-shaped vector beams with polarization order m = 3 by a PBP element with q = 1.5. The first row shows the respective intensity distributions behind a polarizer (GLP2) at different polarization angles when the PBP element is placed at 0°. The second row shows the intensity cross-sections when the PBP element rotates +90°.

The above experimental results show that the proposed method for generating double-ring-shaped vector beams is effective. A dynamic step phase introduced by the SLM makes the reflected laser beam have a nodal cycle in the radial direction. A PBP element is used to manipulate the polarization state of the optical field by introducing a geometric phase. This method can also be extended to generate other higher-order vector beams.

4. Conclusion

We have proposed a method to generate double-ring-shaped vector beams. A step phase modulation introduced by an SLM makes the incident Gauss beam generate a nodal cycle. This phase is dynamic in nature because it depends on the optical path. A PBP element introduces a geometric phase to realize the modulation of the local polarization state. We adopt three PBP elements with q = 1.0, 1.0, and 1.5 to generate double-ring-shaped vector beams with polarization order m = 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The experimental results show that the proposed method can create high-quality double-ring-shaped vector beams. It also provides a new method to manipulate the phase and polarization of the optical field by simultaneously introducing dynamic phase and geometric phase modulation.

Reference
1Zhan Q 2009 Adv. Opt. Photon. 11
2Beckley A MBrown T GAlonso M A 2010 Opt. Express 18 10777
3Galvez E JKhadka SSchubert W HNomoto S 2012 Appl. Opt. 51 2925
4Wang XDing JNi WGuo CWang H 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 3549
5Chen HHao JZhang BXu JDing JWang H 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 3179
6Dorn RQuabis SLeuchs G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 233901
7Deng DGuo Q 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2711
8Hao XKuang CWang TLiu X 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 3928
9Du FZhou ZTan QYang CZhang XZhu L 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 064202
10Chen GSong FWang H 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 3937
11Zhang WLiu SLi PJiao XZhao J 2013 Opt. Express 21 974
12Qin FHuang KWu JJiao JLuo XQiu CHong M 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 09977
13Cheng ZZhou YXia MLi WYang KZhou Y2015Chin. Phys. Lett.7377
14Lerman G MStern LLevy U 2010 Opt. Express 18 27650
15Beckley A MBrown T GAlonso M A 2012 Opt. Express 20 9357
16Pohl D 1972 Appl. Phys. Lett. 20 266
17Bomzon ZKleiner VHasman E 2001 Opt. Lett. 26 1424
18Kang MChen JWang XWang H 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 29 572
19Yang YDong YZhao CCai Y 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 5418
20Man ZMin CZhang YShen ZYuan X 2013 Laser Phys. 23 105001
21Zhou JLiu YKe YLuo HWen S 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3193
22He YLiu ZLiu YZhou JKe YLuo HWen S 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 5506
23Viswanathan N KInavalli V V G K 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 1189
24Niziev V GChang R SNesterov A V 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 8393
25Chen SZhou XLiu YLing XLuo HWen S 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 5274
26Kozawa YSato S 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 820
27Zhang YDing BSuyama T 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 023831
28Tian BPu J 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 2014
29Nie ZLi ZShi GZhang XWang YSong Y 2014 Opt. Lasers Eng. 59 93
30Tidwell S CKim G HKimura W D 1993 Appl. Opt. 32 5222
31Maurer CJesacher AFürhapter SBernet SRitsch-Marte M 2007 New J. Phys. 9 78
32Bomzon ZBiener GKleiner VHasman E 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 1141
33Hasman EKleiner VBiener GNiv A 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 328
34Marrucci L 2008 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 488 148
35Yi XLing XZhang ZLi YZhou XLiu YChen SLuo HWen S 2014 Opt. Express 22 17207
36Liu YLing XYi XZhou XChen SKe YLuo HWen S 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 756
37Beresna MGecevičius MKazansky P GGertus T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 201101
38Beresna MGecevičius MKazansky P G 2011 Opt. Mater. Express 1 783